Minireviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Cardiol. Apr 26, 2017; 9(4): 312-319
Published online Apr 26, 2017. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v9.i4.312
Table 1 Validation studies at glance
Ref.Technique comparedCardiac diseasePopulation studied (n)Results of validation
Taylor et al[19]-Healthy individuals55FT is highly reproducible within operators, requiring a short analysis time
Augustine et al[4]Myocardial taggingHealthy individuals145FT measurements of circumferential strain showed reasonable agreement with myocardial tagging
Schuster et al[2]-Healthy individuals20FT showing reasonable intra-observer reproducibility in different groups of individuals
Lu et al[5]HAARPAnthracycline induced cardiomyopathy26Circumferential strain was found to be a robust and reproducible index of myocardial deformation
Hor et al[7]HAARPDuchenne muscular dystrophy233Good correlation between CMR-FT and HAARP for the mean circumferential strain values
Morton et al[8]-Healthy individuals16FT had good inter-study reproducibility for global strain analysis
Kempny et al[9]STE and simple EBDToF25Feature tracking showed better inter observer reproducibility for circumferential or radial left ventricular and longitudinal right ventricular global strain when compared to STE
Padiyath et al[10]2D echocardiography20 patients with ToF and 20 healthy controls40Reasonable agreement between FT and 2D echo in measurement of global circumferential strain and global longitudinal strain for the left ventricle
Harrild et al[12]Myocardial taggingHCM24Closer agreement between 2 modalities in measuring time to peak strain
Orwat et al[13]Trans-thoracic echocardiogram with speckle trackingHCM40Trans-thoracic echocardiogram with speckle tracking. They found decent agreement between left ventricular longitudinal strain measurements between the 2 modalities while the agreement for circumferential strain not encouraging