Copyright
©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Cardiol. Mar 26, 2017; 9(3): 241-247
Published online Mar 26, 2017. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v9.i3.241
Published online Mar 26, 2017. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v9.i3.241
Table 2 Accuracy of the 3 classifications of chest pain according to medical judgment
Sensitivity | Specificity | Positive LR | Negative LR | Positive PV | Negative PV | |
Classification 1 (2-level) | ||||||
Typical (vs atypical) | 48% (40%-55%) | 66% (59%-73%) | 1.4 (0.65-2.0) | 0.79 (0.62-1.02) | 56% (48%-64%) | 58% (51%-65%) |
Classification 2 (3-level)1 | ||||||
Angina (vs undefined/no-angina) | 42% (34%-50%) | 69% (62%-76%) | 1.35 (0.89-2.1) | 56% (47%-65%) | ||
No-angina (vs undefined/angina) | 76% (69%-83%) | 36% (29%-43%) | 0.67 (0.40-1.1) | 62% (53%-72%) | ||
Classification 3 (4-level)1 | ||||||
Definitely no-angina (vs the other 3 groups) | 27% (20%-34%) | 0.63 (0.32-1.15) | 70% (59%-81%) |
- Citation: das Virgens CMB, Lemos Jr L, Noya-Rabelo M, Carvalhal MC, Cerqueira Junior AMDS, Lopes FOA, de Sá NC, Suerdieck JG, de Souza TMB, Correia VCA, Sodré GS, da Silva AB, Alexandre FKB, Ferreira FRM, Correia LCL. Accuracy of gestalt perception of acute chest pain in predicting coronary artery disease. World J Cardiol 2017; 9(3): 241-247
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8462/full/v9/i3/241.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v9.i3.241