Copyright
©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Cardiol. Mar 26, 2017; 9(3): 212-229
Published online Mar 26, 2017. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v9.i3.212
Published online Mar 26, 2017. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v9.i3.212
Technique | Principal advantages | Disadvantages |
Transthoracic echocardiography | Widespread availability First line diagnostic tool | Poor acoustic window Frequent discrepancy between different parameters |
Transesophageal echocardiography | Good spatial resolution | Suboptimal for distal ascending aorta and arch |
3 D reconstruction | Semi-invasive exam | Anatomic definition and annulus measurement |
Multislice computed tomography | Multiplanar reconstruction Quantification of calcium score Evaluation of aorto-femoral tract | Potential nephrotoxicity of contrast medium Radiations exposition Controlled heart rate |
Magnetic resonance imaging | Tissue characterization Multiplanar reconstruction Evaluation of aorto-femoral tract Controlled heart rate | Reduced availability Poor evaluation of calcifications Contraindicated in metallic devices wearers |
Positron emission tomography | Evaluation of calcification and inflammation | Poor spatial resolution |
- Citation: Cocchia R, D’Andrea A, Conte M, Cavallaro M, Riegler L, Citro R, Sirignano C, Imbriaco M, Cappelli M, Gregorio G, Calabrò R, Bossone E. Patient selection for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A combined clinical and multimodality imaging approach. World J Cardiol 2017; 9(3): 212-229
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8462/full/v9/i3/212.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v9.i3.212