Copyright
©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Cardiol. Feb 26, 2017; 9(2): 167-173
Published online Feb 26, 2017. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v9.i2.167
Published online Feb 26, 2017. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v9.i2.167
Table 3 Follow up
All | Effective SMT | Ineffective SMT | P-value | ||
FU, n (%) | 552 (89.3) | 530 (96) | 22 (100) | ||
FU duration (mo) | Mean (± SD) | 21.1 (± 21) | 21.5 (± 21) | 15.8 (± 21) | P = n.s. |
Antiarrhythmica, n (%) | |||||
Amiodarone | 122 (23.0) | 6 (27) | P = n.s. | ||
Sotalex | 2 (0.4) | 0 (0) | P = n.s. | ||
β-blocker | 485 (91.5) | 20 (91) | P = n.s. | ||
Events during FU, n (%) | 124 (23.4) | 2 (9.1) | P = 0.02 | ||
Inadequate therapy | 4 (0.8) | 2 (9.1) | P = n.s. | ||
ATP | 58 (10.9) | 0 (0) | |||
Shock delivery | 36 (6.8) | 0 (0) | |||
ATP and shock delivery | 20 (3.8) | 0 (0) | |||
VT ablation | 6 (1.1) | 0 (0) |
- Citation: Roos M, Geller JC, Ohlow MA. Critical analysis of ineffective post implantation implantable cardioverter-defibrillator-testing. World J Cardiol 2017; 9(2): 167-173
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8462/full/v9/i2/167.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v9.i2.167