Observational Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Cardiol. Feb 26, 2017; 9(2): 167-173
Published online Feb 26, 2017. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v9.i2.167
Table 2 Characteristics of patients with failed intra-operative safety margin test
nAge at time of implantation (years)Sex (m/f)Indication for ICD implantationLVEF (%)Primary vs secondary ICD indicationFurther management after failed initial SMT
146mLAD stenosed30ppSubcutaneous array
245woCM15ppPDT OK
374woCM36ppSubcutaneous array
441mcmpl revasc39ppSubcutaneous array
554wDCM10ppSubcutaneous array
625moCM20spSubcutaneous array
768mDCM35spSubcutaneous array
869mRCA occluded31spPDT OK
973moCM30ppPDT OK
1037mTGV surgery30ppSubcutaneous array
1169mDCM20ppnone
1246mLAD stenosed30ppSubcutaneous array
1345wDCM15ppPDT OK
1474wDCM36ppSubcutaneous array
1541mcmpl revasc39ppSubcutaneous array
1654wDCM10ppSubcutaneous array
1725mDCM20spSubcutaneous array
1868mDCM35spSubcutaneous array
1969mRCA occluded31spPDT OK
2073mDCM30ppPDT OK
2137mvs D surgery30ppSubcutaneous array
2269mDCM20ppNone