Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Cardiol. Feb 26, 2017; 9(2): 109-133
Published online Feb 26, 2017. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v9.i2.109
Table 16 Key studies illustrating the independent predictive value of cardiovascular magnetic resonance markers for left ventricular remodelling
CMR markerRef.YearnCMR quantificationMain findingsAcute CMR timeFollow-up CMR time
ISHusser et al[33]20123042SDIS extent IP for LVR in model with LVEF, IS, LV volumes, MVO6 d189 d
ISMonmeneu et al[91]20121182SDNumber of segments > 50% transmurality IP for LVR6 d6 mo
ISWu et al[94]2008122ManualIS extent at 2 d only IP for LVEF and LVR2 d4 mo
ISHombach et al[6]2005110ManualIS extent at 6 d was an IP for LVR in model with MVO, % transmurality6 d225 d
L-MVOWeir et al[112]2010100ManualL-MVO extent was only IP of LVR in model with TIMI post PCI, E-MVO, IS4 d6 mo
L-MVOHombach et al[6]2005110ManualL-MVO extent IP of LVR in model with baseline IS, infarct transmurality6 d225 d
IMHCarrick et al[74]2016245T2*IMH strongest IP of LVR in model with patient/angio characteristics, LVEDVI3 d7 mo
IMHHusser et al[33]2012304T2w-TSEIMH strongest IP for LVR in model with LVEF, IS, LV volumes, L-MVO6 d189 d
MSIMonmeneu et al[91]20121182SD LGR/STIRMSI univariate but not IP of LVR in model with IS, LVESVI, segments > 50%6 d6 mo
MSIMasci et al[14]20112602SD STIR, 5SD LGEMSI univariate predictor of LVR and final LVEF. However not IP of either1 wk4 mo
MSIMasci et al[26]2010137> SD STIR, 5SD LGEMSI strongest IP for LVR. However IS and MSI and IS and AAR correlated1 wk4 mo
T1Carrick et al[177]2016300T1 map, 2SD STIR, 5SD LGEInfarct core native T1 inverse relationship with LVR (OR 0.91 per -10 ms T1)2 d6 mo