Copyright
©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Cardiol. Feb 26, 2017; 9(2): 109-133
Published online Feb 26, 2017. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v9.i2.109
Published online Feb 26, 2017. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v9.i2.109
Ref. | Year | n | AAR, IS method | Main findings | CMR timepoint post STEMI | Follow-up |
Mather et al[131] | 2011 | 48 | > 2SD STIR, > 2SD LGE | MSI was IP for LVR (OR 0.95) in model including LV volumes, LVEF, IS, IMH, MVO | 2 d | 3 mo |
Monmeneu et al[91] | 2012 | 118 | > 2SD STIR, > 2SD LGE | MSI univariate predictor of LVR and final LVEF. However not IP of LVR in model with LVESVI, IS, no. transmural segs | 6 d | 6 mo |
Masci et al[14] | 2011 | 260 | > 2SD STIR, > 5SD LGE | MSI strong univariate predictor of LVR and final LVEF. However not IP in model including IS, MVO | 1 wk | 4 mo |
Masci et al[26] | 2010 | 137 | > 2SD STIR, > 5SD LGE | MSI strongest IP for LVR However IS and MSI (r = -0.72) and IS and AAR (r = 0.85) correlated | 1 wk | 4 mo |
- Citation: Khan JN, McCann GP. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging assessment of outcomes in acute myocardial infarction. World J Cardiol 2017; 9(2): 109-133
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8462/full/v9/i2/109.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v9.i2.109