Copyright
©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Cardiol. Feb 26, 2017; 9(2): 109-133
Published online Feb 26, 2017. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v9.i2.109
Published online Feb 26, 2017. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v9.i2.109
Ref. | Year | n | CMR timepoints post STEMI | AAR, IS method | Main findings |
Mather et al[18] | 2011 | 48 | 2 d → 1 wk → 30 d → 3 mo | > 2SD STIR, > 2SD LGE | AAR reduction at successive timepoints, 1-3 mo (-75%). No change MSI at d2 or 1 wk as IS and AAR decreased proportionally |
Dall’Armelina et al[21] | 2011 | 30 | 2 d → 1 wk → 2 wk → 6 mo | > 2SD T2p-BB, > 2SD LGE | 100% had oedema at d2. AAR stable over 1st week (37% vs 39% LVM). Decreased by 2 wk and nearly resolved at 6 mo |
Carlsson et al[138] | 2009 | 16 | 1 d → 1 wk → 6 wk → 6 mo | Manual STIR, and LGE | AAR at all timepoints. AAR stable in 1st week, correlated with 1 wk SPECT. Decrease by 1 mo (10% LVM), nearly gone by 6 mo |
Ripa et al[5] | 2007 | 58 | 2 d → 1 mo → 6 mo | Manual STIR and LGE | All had oedema at d2. AAR decreased at all time points. No data on MSI in this study |
- Citation: Khan JN, McCann GP. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging assessment of outcomes in acute myocardial infarction. World J Cardiol 2017; 9(2): 109-133
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8462/full/v9/i2/109.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v9.i2.109