Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Cardiol. Feb 26, 2017; 9(2): 109-133
Published online Feb 26, 2017. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v9.i2.109
Table 11 Cardiovascular magnetic resonance studies illustrating the importance of intramyocardial haemorrhage on left ventricular function and remodelling in acute myocardial infarction
Ref.YearnIMH CMR methodMain findingsCMR time post MIMean/median F/U CMR
Carrick et al[74]2016245T2*IMH strongest IP for LVR. IMH associated with lower LVEF and greater volumes3 d7 mo
Kidambi et al[115]201339T2w-TSE and T2*IMH associated with attenuation of follow-up infarct strain3 d3 mo
Husser et al[33]2012304T2w-TSEIMH strongest IP for LVR in model with LVEF, IS, LV vol, L-MVO6 d189 d
Mather et al[131]201148T2w-TSE and T2*IMH strongest IP of LVR in model with IS, LVEF, LVESV, E-MVO, MSI2 d3 mo
Beek et al[24]201045T2w-TSEIMH was a univariate predictor of LVEF. However no prognostic significance beyond baseline LVEF and MVO in predicting final LVEF5 d4 mo
Bekkers et al[121]201090T2w-TSEAcute MSI and LVEF increase at follow-up lowest if IMH present. But IMH no prognostic significance beyond MVO in predicting LVEF5 d103 d
O’Regan et al[126]201050T2*IMH presence univariate predictor of LVEF and LV volumes. However only IS independently predicted LVEF3 dN/A
Ganame et al[25]200998T2w-TSEIMH extent strongest IP of LVR in model with IS, E-MVO, Troponin-I, AAR, TTR, IS2 d4 mo