Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Cardiol. Feb 26, 2017; 9(2): 109-133
Published online Feb 26, 2017. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v9.i2.109
Table 10 Cardiovascular magnetic resonance studies illustrating the prognostic importance of late microvascular obstruction in acute myocardial infarction
Ref.YearnLGE methodMain findingsTime of prognostic CMR post STEMIFollow-up
Regenfus et al[117]2015249ManualL-MVO extent strongest IP for MACE in model including IS, LVEF, TIMI pre and post PPCI and no. diseased vessels3.7 d72 mo
Eitel et al[119]2014738> 5SDLargest multicentre study of L-MVO in PPCI. L-MVO > 1.4% LVM and TIMI risk score only IPs of combined MACE. Adding L-MVO to model with clinical predictors, LVEF and IS increased c-statistic7 d6 mo
de Waha et al[120]2012438ManualL-MVO extent IP for combined MACE in model including IS, LV volumes (only other IP was LVEF). L-MVO/IS strongest IP in model including L-MVO extent, LVEF, IS, LV volumes3 d19 mo
de Waha et al[36]2010438ManualPresence and extent of L-MVO were strongest IPs for MACE and mortality in models with IS, LVEF, ST-res, TIMI-flow post PCI. E-MVO was not an IP3 d19 mo
Cochet et al[37]2009184ManualL-MVO strongest IP for MACE, in models including GRACE score, IS, LVEF. L-MVO stronger IP than E-MVO (OR 8.7 vs 2.5)“3-7 d”12 mo
Bruder et al[116]2008143ManualOnly extent of L-MVO > 0.5% LV mass was IP for MACE; model included IS, LVEF, age, DM, sex4.5 d12 mo
Hombach et al[6]2005110ManualL-MVO IP for MACE (P = 0.04) in model including LV end-diastolic volume and LVEF6 d268 d