Copyright
©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Cardiol. Nov 26, 2017; 9(11): 807-812
Published online Nov 26, 2017. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v9.i11.807
Published online Nov 26, 2017. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v9.i11.807
Variables | Safeguard radial, n = 42 | TR band, n = 42 | P value |
Age, years | 63.8 ± 10.9 | 66.8 ± 10.8 | 0.21 |
Gender, male/female ratio | 31/11 | 37/5 | 0.16 |
BMI, kg/m2 | 29.2 ± 3.9 | 29.0 ± 5.7 | 0.88 |
Diabetes | 4 (10%) | 8 (19%) | 0.22 |
CKD | 1 (2%) | 2 (5%) | 0.56 |
PAD | 0% | 1 (2%) | 0.32 |
Indication | |||
Elective | 18 | 16 | 0.88 |
UA | 6 | 8 | 0.9 |
NSTEMI | 13 | 8 | 0.7 |
STEMI | 5 | 10 | 0.6 |
- Citation: Voon V, AyyazUlHaq M, Cahill C, Mannix K, Ahern C, Hennessy T, SamerArnous, Kiernan T. Randomized study comparing incidence of radial artery occlusion post-percutaneous coronary intervention between two conventional compression devices using a novel air-inflation technique. World J Cardiol 2017; 9(11): 807-812
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8462/full/v9/i11/807.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v9.i11.807