Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Cardiol. Dec 26, 2016; 8(12): 735-745
Published online Dec 26, 2016. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v8.i12.735
Published online Dec 26, 2016. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v8.i12.735
Variable | New PPM (n = 43) | No PPM (n = 201) | P value |
Complete RBBB | 12 (32.4) | 17 (9.5) | 0.001 |
Complete LBBB | 0 (0) | 14 (7.8) | 0.14 |
Fascicular block | 12 (32.4) | 33 (18.4) | 0.07 |
QRS duration, ms | 108 ± 26 | 101 ± 23 | 0.1 |
PR duration, ms | 196 ± 37 | 183 ± 30 | 0.04 |
Implant depth (septal), mm | 5.3 ± 2.4 | 5.0 ± 2.6 | 0.67 |
Implant depth (non-septal), mm | 4.9 ± 2.4 | 5.2 ± 1.9 | 0.64 |
Device lack of coaxiality during deployment, mm | 4.0 ± 3.6 | 2.9 ± 2.5 | 0.06 |
- Citation: Sawaya FJ, Spaziano M, Lefèvre T, Roy A, Garot P, Hovasse T, Neylon A, Benamer H, Romano M, Unterseeh T, Morice MC, Chevalier B. Comparison between the SAPIEN S3 and the SAPIEN XT transcatheter heart valves: A single-center experience. World J Cardiol 2016; 8(12): 735-745
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8462/full/v8/i12/735.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v8.i12.735