Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Cardiol. Jan 26, 2016; 8(1): 41-56
Published online Jan 26, 2016. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v8.i1.41
Table 5 Summary of results from studies included looking at Cox-Maze procedures
ProcedureRef.Sample sizeMean follow-up periodOutcomeImportant findings
Cox-MazeCox et al[7]178 patients8.5 yr93% freedom from AFCox-Maze procedure developed
Cox-MazeMcCarthy et al[16]100 patients3 yr90.4% in sinus rhythm or atrial pacingAssociated with low perioperative and late morbidity rates
Cox-MazeSchaff et al[17]221 patients6 yr90% in sinus rhythmCM procedure was useful in patients requiring valvuloplasty for mitral regurgitation
Modified Cox-Maze with bipolar RFAGaynor et al[18]40 patients6 mo91% in sinus rhythmModification of CM-III shortened and simplified the procedure with no change in short-term efficacy