Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Cardiol. Jan 26, 2016; 8(1): 41-56
Published online Jan 26, 2016. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v8.i1.41
Published online Jan 26, 2016. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v8.i1.41
Indications for concomitant surgical ablation of AF |
Symptomatic AF refractory or intolerant to at least one Class 1 or 3 antiarrhythmic medication |
Paroxysmal: Surgical ablation is reasonable for patients undergoing surgery for other indications (IIa, C) |
Persistent: Surgical ablation is reasonable for patients undergoing surgery for other indications (IIa, C) |
Longstanding persistent: Surgical ablation is reasonable for patients undergoing surgery for other indications (IIa, C) |
Symptomatic AF prior to initiation of antiarrhythmic drug therapy with a Class 1 or 3 antiarrhythmic agent |
Paroxysmal: Surgical ablation is reasonable for patients undergoing surgery for other indications (IIa, C) |
Persistent: Surgical ablation is reasonable for patients undergoing surgery for other indications (IIa, C) |
Longstanding persistent: Surgical ablation may be considered for patients undergoing surgery for other indications (IIb, C) |
Indications for standing alone surgical ablation of AF |
Symptomatic AF refractory or intolerant to at least one Class 1 or 3 antiarrhythmic medication |
Paroxysmal: Stand alone surgical ablation may be considered for patients who have not failed catheter ablation but prefer a surgical approach (IIb, C) |
Paroxysmal: Stand alone surgical ablation may be considered for patients who have failed one or more attempts at catheter ablation (IIb, C) |
Persistent: Stand alone surgical ablation may be considered for patients who have not failed catheter ablation but prefer a surgical approach (IIb, C) |
Persistent: Stand alone surgical ablation may be considered for patients who have failed one or more attempts at catheter ablation (IIb, C) |
Longstanding persistent: Stand alone surgical ablation may be considered for patients who have not failed catheter ablation but prefer a surgical approach (IIb, C) |
Longstanding persistent: Stand alone surgical ablation may be considered for patients who have failed one or more attempts at catheter ablation (IIb, C) |
Symptomatic AF prior to initiation of antiarrhythmic drug therapy with a Class 1 or 3 antiarrhythmic agent |
Paroxysmal: Stand alone surgical ablation is not recommended (III, C) |
Persistent: Stand alone surgical ablation is not recommended (III, C) |
Longstanding persistent: Stand alone surgical ablation is not recommended (III, C) |
- Citation: Kyprianou K, Pericleous A, Stavrou A, Dimitrakaki IA, Challoumas D, Dimitrakakis G. Surgical perspectives in the management of atrial fibrillation. World J Cardiol 2016; 8(1): 41-56
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8462/full/v8/i1/41.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v8.i1.41