Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Cardiol. Sep 26, 2015; 7(9): 525-538
Published online Sep 26, 2015. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v7.i9.525
Published online Sep 26, 2015. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v7.i9.525
Technique | Cutoff value | Implications | Commentary |
CFR | < 2 | Unspecific macrovascular and microvascular inability to increase flow | Patients with CFR > 2 have favorable outcomes |
FFR | ≤ 0.8 | Functionally significant epicardial stenosis | Extensive clinical validation |
Requires vasodilation | |||
iFR | ≤ 0.9 | Functionally significant epicardial stenosis | Functionally significant epicardial stenosis |
Vasodilation-Independent | |||
HSR | 0.8 mmHg × s/cm | Functionally significant epicardial stenosis | Requires doppler-pressure wire |
Convenient in the presence FFR/CFR discordances | |||
HMR | > 2 mmHg × s/cm | Microvascular dysfunction | Requires doppler-pressure wire |
IMR | > 25 mmHg × s | Microvascular dysfunction | Thermodilution method |
- Citation: Díez-delhoyo F, Gutiérrez-Ibañes E, Loughlin G, Sanz-Ruiz R, Vázquez-Álvarez ME, Sarnago-Cebada F, Angulo-Llanos R, Casado-Plasencia A, Elízaga J, Diáz FFA. Coronary physiology assessment in the catheterization laboratory. World J Cardiol 2015; 7(9): 525-538
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8462/full/v7/i9/525.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v7.i9.525