Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Cardiol. Aug 26, 2015; 7(8): 490-498
Published online Aug 26, 2015. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v7.i8.490
Published online Aug 26, 2015. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v7.i8.490
Table 4 Evolution of echocardiographic parameters: end-diastolic volume, end-systolic volume and ejection fraction in the NO pacing group (22/22 patients), in the right ventricular apical pacing group (33/33 patients) and in the parahisian group (121/230 patients)
Basal | Follow-up | P | ||
Contr (22 pts) | EDV (mL) | 88 ± 25 | 99 ± 46 | 0.23 (ns) |
ESV (mL) | 38 ± 13 | 46 ± 29 | 0.11 (ns) | |
EF (%) | 57 ± 5 | 56 ± 5 | 0.1 (ns) | |
RVA (33 pts) | EDV (mL) | 98 ± 23 | 139 ± 31 | < 0.0001 |
ESV (mL) | 44 ± 14 | 79 ± 22 | < 0.0001 | |
EF (%) | 56 ± 6 | 43 ± 9 | < 0.0001 | |
PH (121 pts) | EDV (mL) | 100 ± 37 | 104 ± 40 | 0.35 (ns) |
ESV (mL) | 49 ± 27 | 55 ± 31 | 0.05 | |
EF (%) | 53 ± 11 | 49 ± 11 | 0.01 |
- Citation: Occhetta E, Quirino G, Baduena L, Nappo R, Cavallino C, Facchini E, Pistelli P, Magnani A, Bortnik M, Francalacci G, Dell’Era G, Plebani L, Marino P. Right ventricular septal pacing: Safety and efficacy in a long term follow up. World J Cardiol 2015; 7(8): 490-498
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8462/full/v7/i8/490.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v7.i8.490