Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Cardiol. Aug 26, 2015; 7(8): 490-498
Published online Aug 26, 2015. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v7.i8.490
Published online Aug 26, 2015. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v7.i8.490
Table 3 New York Heart Association functional class before implantation and at follow-up, in patients with a low percentage of stimulation (NO pacing), with apical pacing (right ventricular apical pacing) and with parahisian pacing groups
| NO pacing(22 pts) | RVA pacing(33 pts) | PH pacing(167 pts) | |
| Baseline | 1.09 ± 0.29 | 1.15 ± 0.36 | 2.15 ± 0.51 |
| Follow-up | 1.22 ± 0.52 | 1.88 ± 0.99 | 1.59 ± 0.55 |
| Significance | 0.32 (ns) | P < 0.05 | P < 0.001 |
| Unchanged | Worsening | Improvement |
- Citation: Occhetta E, Quirino G, Baduena L, Nappo R, Cavallino C, Facchini E, Pistelli P, Magnani A, Bortnik M, Francalacci G, Dell’Era G, Plebani L, Marino P. Right ventricular septal pacing: Safety and efficacy in a long term follow up. World J Cardiol 2015; 7(8): 490-498
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8462/full/v7/i8/490.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v7.i8.490