Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Cardiol. Oct 26, 2015; 7(10): 621-632
Published online Oct 26, 2015. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v7.i10.621
Table 1 Clinical studies on remote ischemic conditioning in percutaneous coronary intervention
Ref.Patients n (CTRLS/RIPC)ST or LT outcomeConditioning protocol
Primary endpointResults
I/R cyclesCuff pressureLimbRIPCCTRLSP
Remote ischemic preconditioning
Prasad et al[73], 201348/47ST3 × 3’200 mmHgUpperPost-PCI myonecrosis (cTnT ≥ 0.03 ng/dL)40%47%0.42
Ahmed et al[76], 201372/77ST3 × 5’200 mmHgUppercTnT 16 h post-PCI0.02 ng/mL0.047 ng/mL0.047
Ghaemian et al[77], 201040/40ST2 × 5’Above systolicLowerTnT 24 h post-PCI12.50%40%0.01
Hoole et al[74], 2009117/125ST3 × 5’200 mmHgUppercTnI 24 h post-PCI0.06 ng/mL0.16 ng/mL0.04
Luo e et al[78], 2013104/101ST3 × 5’200 mmHgUpperhs-cTnI 16 h post-PCI0.11 ng/mL0.21 ng/mL< 0.01
Xu et al[79], 201498/102ST3 × 5’200 mmHgUpperhs-cTnI 16 h post-PCI0.29 ng/mL0.38 ng/mL0.256
Davies et al[75], 2013117/125LT3 × 5’200 mmHgUpperMACCE (6 yr follow up)23360.039
Bøtker et al[81], 2010167/166ST4 × 5’200 mmHgUpperMSI after 30 d0.750.550.033
Sloth et al[82], 2014167/166LT4 × 5’200 mmHgUpperMACCE rates (5 yr follow-up)25.60%13.50%0.018
Carrasco-Chinchilla et al[83], 2013114/118ST3 × 5’200 mmHgUpperTnI 24 h post-PCI0.476 ng/mL0.478 ng/mL0.378