Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Cardiol. Oct 26, 2015; 7(10): 594-602
Published online Oct 26, 2015. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v7.i10.594
Published online Oct 26, 2015. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v7.i10.594
Minimum | Maximum | Ref. | |
Probability of success of a CABG surgery following a coronary angiography after a failure of a DES | 90% | - | Sheiban et al[18] |
Probability of success of pharmaceutical treatment after a failure of a DES | 85% | 90% | Sheiban et al[18] |
Probability of success after a first DES | 82.2% | 97.5% | Simsek et al[19] Bakhai et al[20] Meredith et al[21] Morice et al[22] Toutouzas et al[23] Weisz et al[24] Serruys et al[25] Yan et al[26] |
Probability of success after 1 yr of surveillance following a first DES | 86.3% | 98.7% | Simsek et al[19] Meredith et al[21] Park et al[27] |
Probability of undergoing a second PCI following a coronary angiography after a failure of a DES | 50% | 60% | Malenka et al[28] |
Probability of undergoing a surgery following a coronary angiography after a failure of a bare metal stent | 30% | 40% | Malenka et al[28] |
Probability of undergoing a DES after a failure of a first DES | 60% | 70% | Sheiban et al[18] |
Probability of success of a DES after a failure of a first DES | 74.8% | 90% | Steinberg et al[29] Ge et al[30] Lee et al[31] |
Probability of success of a CBA after a failure of a first DES | 60% | 77% | Park et al[32] |
- Citation: Beresniak A, Caruba T, Sabatier B, Juillière Y, Dubourg O, Danchin N. Cost-effectiveness modelling of percutaneous coronary interventions in stable coronary artery disease. World J Cardiol 2015; 7(10): 594-602
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8462/full/v7/i10/594.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v7.i10.594