Topic Highlight
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Cardiol. Sep 26, 2014; 6(9): 929-938
Published online Sep 26, 2014. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v6.i9.929
Table 2 Randomized controlled trials of second-generation drug eluting stents in ST elevated myocardial infarction
StudyYearPrimary endpointDesignRandomized ratioMaximal length of follow-upStent comparisons (n)Results of the primary endpoint
ZEST-AMI[38]2009Death, MI, and ischemia-driven TVR at 1 yrMulticenter, safety study1:1:11 yrPES/SES/PC-ZES 328 (110/110/108)No significant differences between stents
KOMER[39]2011Cardiac death, MI, ischemia-driven TLR at 1 yrMulticenter, safety study1:1:118 moPES/SES/PC-ZES 611 (202/204/205)PC-ZES as safe as SES and PES
EXAMINATION[40,41]2011Death, MI, any revascularization at 1 yrMulticenter, superiority1:12 yrCoCr-EES/BMS 1504 (751/747)CoCr-EES superior to BMS
XAMI[42]2012Cardiac death, MI, TVR at 1 yrMulticenter, noninferiority2:11 yrEES/SES 625 (404/221)EES noninferior to SES
COMFORTABLE AMI[43]2012cardiac death, reinfarction, and TLR at 1 yrMulticenter, superiority1:11 yrEES/BMS 1161 (575/582)BES superior to BMS