Topic Highlight
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Cardiol. Jul 26, 2014; 6(7): 562-576
Published online Jul 26, 2014. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v6.i7.562
Table 3 Main studies evaluating the role of microvolt T-wave alternans in predicting arrhythmic and non arrhythmic events
Ref.Clinical settingNumber of patientsParameter evaluatedEnd-points(mean follow-up)Results
Adachi et al[56], 1999NIDCM57TWA, LVEF, NYHA, Signal average ECG, QT dispersionVentricular tachycardiaMTWA associated with VT
Klingenheben et al[57], 2000CHF (no history SVT/VF)107TWAArrhythmic events (follow-up 18 mo)MTWA is an independent predictor of arrhythmic events
Kitamura et al[58], 2002NIDCM146Onset heart rate for TWASCD, documented sustained ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation (follow-up 21 ± 14 mo)TWA and LVEF were independent predictors of arrhythmic events
Hohnloser et al[59], 2003NIDCM (LVEF 29 ± 11%)137MTWA, FEVS, mean RR interval, HRV, BRS.SCD, SCA, SVT or VF (follow-up 14 ± 6 mo)MTWA is an independent predictor of ventricular tachyarrhythmic events
Bloomfield et al[60], 2004IDCM (LVEF ≤ 30%)177MTWA, QRS measurementAll-cause mortality. (follow-up 20 ± 6 mo)Compared to QRS duration, an abnormal MTWA is a stronger predictor of death
Salerno-Uriate et al[61], 2007NIDCM (NYHA II-III LVEF ≤ 40%)446TWA, VO2 peakCombined primary endpoint of cardiac death and life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias Secondary endpoint: total mortality, combination of arrhythmic death and life-threatening arrhythmias. (follow-up 18 to 24 mo)Abnormal TWA associated with a 4-fold higher risk of cardiac death and life-threatening arrhythmias
Baravelli et al[62], 2007NIDCM (NYHA II-III LVEF 29 ± 6.4%)70MTWA, VO2 peakCombined primary endpoint of MCE: total cardiac death or VT/VF (including appropriate ICD shock) Secondary endpoint: MAE: SCD or SVT/VF (follow-up 19.2 ± 10.7 mo)MTWA and peak VO2, but not the two single tests, were significant prognostic markers of both MCE and MA
Gold et al[63], 2008CHF (IDCM/NIDCM, 71% NYHA II, LVEF 24 ± 7%)490TWAComposite primary end point: SCD, SVT / VF, or appropriate ICD discharge (follow-up 30 mo)MTWA not predictive of MAE or mortality
Costantini et al[64], 2009IDCM LVEF ≤ 40%566TWA, EPSPrimary endpoint: appropriate ICD discharge or SCD at 1 yr follow-up (follow-up 1.6 ± 0.6 yr)Strategies employing MTWA, EPS, or both might identify the subset of patients least likely to benefit from ICD implantation