Topic Highlight
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Cardiol. Jul 26, 2014; 6(7): 562-576
Published online Jul 26, 2014. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v6.i7.562
Table 2 Main studies evaluating the role of dynamic ventricular repolarization measures in predicting arrhythmic and non arrhythmic events
Ref.Clinical settingNumber of patientsParameter evaluatedCut-off suggestedEnd-points(mean follow-up)Results
Chevalier et al[46], 2003Acute myocardial infarction265QT dynamicity and HRV (24-h Holter) LVEF Late potentialQTe slope: 0.18Sudden death and total mortality (follow-up 81 ± 27 mo)Increased diurnal QTe dynamicity independently associated with sudden death
Haigney et al[47], 2004Postinfarction patients (low LVEF)871QT variability (QTVN) QTVI (QTVN adjusted for heart rate variance)Arrhythmic events (VT or VF) (follow-up 2 yr)Increased QT variability associated with an increased risk for VT/VF
Jensen et al[48], 2005Postinfarction patients481QT/RR slope and intercept QT/RR VR LVEF VPB and VTAll-cause mortality (follow-up 3 yr)VR, LVEF, VPB and age made up the optimal Cox model for risk stratification. VR was a promising risk factor for identifying sudden arrhythmic death
Iacoviello et al[49], 2007NIDCM (no history of SVT/VF)179QTe slope (24 h Holter) LVEF NSVT QRS duration QTc and QTd at ECGQTe-slope: 0.19Major arrhythmic events, (VT or VF or SCD) (follow-up 39 ± 22 mo)Increased QTe slope is associated with occurrence of major arrhythmic events. The presence of NSVT and/or QTe slope > 0.19 showed 90% sensitivity and 60% specificity in identifying patients with arrhythmic events
Cygankiewicz et al[50], 2009CHF patients. IDCM/NIDCM LVEF ≥ 35%294QTe slope SDNN TS LVEFQTe slope: 0.21Primary endpoint: total mortality Secondary endpoint: sudden death (follow-up 44-mo)Combination of SDNN, TS, and QTe slope is a predictor of increased risk of mortality and sudden death