Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Cardiol. Jul 26, 2014; 6(7): 562-576
Published online Jul 26, 2014. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v6.i7.562
Published online Jul 26, 2014. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v6.i7.562
Ref. | Clinical setting | Number of patients | Parameter evaluated | Cut-off suggested | End-points(mean follow-up) | Results |
Chevalier et al[46], 2003 | Acute myocardial infarction | 265 | QT dynamicity and HRV (24-h Holter) LVEF Late potential | QTe slope: 0.18 | Sudden death and total mortality (follow-up 81 ± 27 mo) | Increased diurnal QTe dynamicity independently associated with sudden death |
Haigney et al[47], 2004 | Postinfarction patients (low LVEF) | 871 | QT variability (QTVN) QTVI (QTVN adjusted for heart rate variance) | Arrhythmic events (VT or VF) (follow-up 2 yr) | Increased QT variability associated with an increased risk for VT/VF | |
Jensen et al[48], 2005 | Postinfarction patients | 481 | QT/RR slope and intercept QT/RR VR LVEF VPB and VT | All-cause mortality (follow-up 3 yr) | VR, LVEF, VPB and age made up the optimal Cox model for risk stratification. VR was a promising risk factor for identifying sudden arrhythmic death | |
Iacoviello et al[49], 2007 | NIDCM (no history of SVT/VF) | 179 | QTe slope (24 h Holter) LVEF NSVT QRS duration QTc and QTd at ECG | QTe-slope: 0.19 | Major arrhythmic events, (VT or VF or SCD) (follow-up 39 ± 22 mo) | Increased QTe slope is associated with occurrence of major arrhythmic events. The presence of NSVT and/or QTe slope > 0.19 showed 90% sensitivity and 60% specificity in identifying patients with arrhythmic events |
Cygankiewicz et al[50], 2009 | CHF patients. IDCM/NIDCM LVEF ≥ 35% | 294 | QTe slope SDNN TS LVEF | QTe slope: 0.21 | Primary endpoint: total mortality Secondary endpoint: sudden death (follow-up 44-mo) | Combination of SDNN, TS, and QTe slope is a predictor of increased risk of mortality and sudden death |
- Citation: Iacoviello M, Monitillo F. Non-invasive evaluation of arrhythmic risk in dilated cardiomyopathy: From imaging to electrocardiographic measures. World J Cardiol 2014; 6(7): 562-576
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8462/full/v6/i7/562.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v6.i7.562