Topic Highlight
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Cardiol. Jun 26, 2014; 6(6): 424-433
Published online Jun 26, 2014. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v6.i6.424
Table 1 Effect of direct transfer on time delays n (%)
nDTBTTTFPStaffRef.
161 (DT 13)87 vs 168-14%Physician[24]
658 (DT 25.2)-146 vs 191-Physician[25]
401 (DT 59.9)124 vs 154 (group PPCI)--Paramedics[55]
301 (DT 35.8)74 vs 116150 vs 2037%Paramedics (teletransmission)[28]
344 (DT 39.2)69 vs 123158 vs 230-Paramedics[21]
1437 (DT 42.9)83 vs 103150 vs 200-Paramedics (teletransmission)[26]
581 (DT 78)69 vs 118149 vs 219-Paramedics (computed algorithm)[61]
1194 (DT 21)102 vs 125189 vs 2594.7%Physician[27]
1859 (DT 23)105 vs 122185 vs 255-Physician[67]

  • Citation: Estévez-Loureiro R, López-Sainz &, Pérez de Prado A, Cuellas C, Calviño Santos R, Alonso-Orcajo N, Salgado Fernández J, Vázquez-Rodríguez JM, López-Benito M, Fernández-Vázquez F. Timely reperfusion for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: Effect of direct transfer to primary angioplasty on time delays and clinical outcomes. World J Cardiol 2014; 6(6): 424-433
  • URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8462/full/v6/i6/424.htm
  • DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v6.i6.424