Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Cardiol. Jun 26, 2014; 6(6): 415-423
Published online Jun 26, 2014. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v6.i6.415
Published online Jun 26, 2014. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v6.i6.415
Attributes of a good registry | Practical aspects |
Standardised data collection and definitions | Pre-project agreement of common data definitions (e.g., use of the Cardiology Audit and Registration Data standards[56]) and, where possible, standardised data collecting techniques |
Rapid data collection | Computer web based data collection allowing rapid data accrual and transmission; agreed timeliness of data entry |
Case ascertainment/data completeness | Built in data checking during submission; regular data validation exercises (e.g., the NCDR Data Quality Program[57]); comparison of case numbers with some other measure of unit activity; regular audit of participating sites to identify areas for improvement; explicit definition of participation in the registry and of a minimum dataset for each record; linkage to other complementary dataset[58] |
Sequential enrolment | Allows for representative data without cherry-picking |
Appointment of key stakeholders to a formal Steering Committee | Eeffective coordination of registry with oversight to share good practice and important results; guarantee analyses; clinical leadership and endorsement by professional bodies; regular revisions of the dataset reflect changes in practice |
Random multi-site collection or mandated participation | Reduces the risk of population or site bias (as is common with RCTs in large academic city centres); enables comparisons between sites |
Appropriate ethical considerations | Addresses both legal and ethical issues of patient consent; confidentiality; anonymity; data linkage (see below) |
Clear and comprehensive result presentation | Clear and full results with meaningful and appropriate conclusions that reflect the findings and are presented in a way the target audience understands (e.g., funnel plots); easy access to data and reports; clear explanations of any statistical adjustments |
Transparent study background and funding | Prospective declarations of any issues |
- Citation: Ashrafi R, Hussain H, Brisk R, Boardman L, Weston C. Clinical disease registries in acute myocardial infarction. World J Cardiol 2014; 6(6): 415-423
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8462/full/v6/i6/415.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v6.i6.415