Review
Copyright ©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Cardiol. Aug 26, 2013; 5(8): 270-279
Published online Aug 26, 2013. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v5.i8.270
Table 3 Comparison of various methods to evaluate cardiac iron overload in thalassemia patients
MethodAdvantagesDisadvantages
Serum ferritinEasy and availablePoor predictor of iron overload[85,86]
InexpensiveNonspecific for cardiac iron
Altered by many conditions[14]
EchocardiogramEasy and availableLate indicator of cardiac involvement[21,23]
Inexpensive
Liver biopsyTotal body iron estimation[32]Invasive
No correlation with myocardial iron deposition[33]
Myocardial biopsyInvasive No correlation with cardiac iron status and function[34]
ECGEasy and availableIneffective screening parameter for cardiac iron overload[25,31]
Inexpensive
SQUIDStandardized noninvasive index for liver iron[36]Lack of availability, technical demands, and reproducibility
Costly
Application for the study of heart iron pending
NTBIDirect parameter of freeform iron resulting inLimited availability
peroxidative damage[87]No generally accepted method[48], and poor correlation
between methods[49]
CMR T2*Method of choice for the assessment of tissue iron deposition in last decade[51]Costly
Noninvasive measurement of cardiac iron deposition[50]
Available
High sensitivity and reproducible[50]
Correlation with clinical outcome[16,17,56,62,63]