Copyright
©2012 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Cardiol. May 26, 2012; 4(5): 157-172
Published online May 26, 2012. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v4.i5.157
Published online May 26, 2012. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v4.i5.157
Table 3 Clinical trials comparing prophylactic renal replacement therapy and control group for radiocontrast-induced nephropathy after coronary angiography procedure (Baseline chronic kidney disease stage 4-5)
Ref. | Time from contrast exposure to the start of RRT (modes of RRT and duration) | CKD stage, No. of patients (RRT:control) | Incidence of RCIN results (RR, 95% CI) | Permanent dialysis rate of RCIN | In-hospital mortality of RCIN |
Marenzi et al[75] (2003) interventional procedures | 0 (CVVH 22-30 h) | Stage 4, 114 (58:56) | 4/58 vs 32/56 (RR = 0.12, 0.05-0.32) | 2/58 vs 11/56 (RR = 0.18, 0.04-0.76) | 1/58 vs 8/56 (RR = 0.11, 0.01-0.87) |
Marenzi et al[76] (2006) diagnostic and interventional procedures | 0 (CVVH 18-36 h) | Stage 4, 92 (62: 30) | 9/62 vs 12/30 (RR = 0.36, 0.17-0.77) | NA | 3/62 vs 6/30 (RR = 0.20, 0.05-0.88) |
Lee et al[77] (2007) diagnostic procedures | 81 ± 32 min (HD 4 h) | Stage 5, 82 (42:40) | 2/42 vs 18/40 (RR = 0.11, 0.03-0.43) | 0/42 vs 5/40 (RR = 0.09, 0-1.52) | No |
- Citation: Hung YM, Lin SL, Hung SY, Huang WC, Wang PYP. Preventing radiocontrast-induced nephropathy in chronic kidney disease patients undergoing coronary angiography. World J Cardiol 2012; 4(5): 157-172
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8462/full/v4/i5/157.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v4.i5.157