Copyright
©2011 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Cardiol. Mar 26, 2011; 3(3): 84-92
Published online Mar 26, 2011. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v3.i3.84
Published online Mar 26, 2011. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v3.i3.84
Name | Stent design | Cardiac death | Cardiac death or MI | MI | TVR | TLR |
LEADERS[28] | Biomatrix | 2.1 | 6.7 | 5.8 | 7.8 | 6.5 |
Cypher | 2.7 | 6.6 | 4.6 | 9.9 | 7.4 | |
Nobori | 0.0 | - | 4.7 | 7.1 | 0.0 | |
NOBORI[34] | Taxus | 0.0 | - | 8.6 | 14.3 | 2.9 |
ISAR-TEST-3[35] | Biodegradable polymer stent | 2.0 | 2.5 | 1.5 | - | 5.9 |
Permanent polymer sirolimus | 2.0 | 3.5 | 2.0 | - | 7.9 | |
Polymer free sirolimus | 2.0 | 4.0 | 2.5 | - | 12.9 | |
ISAR-TEST-4[36] | Biodegradable polymer | 2.8 | 6.3 | 4.3 | 13.7 | 8.8 |
Control1 | 3.2 | 6.2 | 4.1 | 13.9 | 9.4 | |
EUCATAX[39] | PES | 1.9 | 4.7 | 2.8 | 8.2 | 6.1 |
BMS | 1.9 | 4.3 | 2.4 | 15.0 | 12.6 |
- Citation: Rodriguez-Granillo A, Rubilar B, Rodriguez-Granillo G, Rodriguez AE. Advantages and disadvantages of biodegradable platforms in drug eluting stents. World J Cardiol 2011; 3(3): 84-92
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8462/full/v3/i3/84.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v3.i3.84