Copyright
©2011 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Cardiol. Oct 26, 2011; 3(10): 315-321
Published online Oct 26, 2011. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v3.i10.315
Published online Oct 26, 2011. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v3.i10.315
Situation | Class of recommendation | Level of evidence |
An invasive strategy is indicated in patients with: | I | A |
GRACE score > 140 or at least one high-risk criterion | ||
Recurrent symptoms | ||
Inducible ischemia at stress test | ||
An early invasive strategy (< 24 h) is indicated in patients with GRACE score > 140 or multiple other high-risk criteria | I | A |
A late invasive strategy (within 72 h) is indicated in patients with GRACE score < 140 or absence of multiple other high-risk criteria but with recurrent symptoms or stress-inducible ischemia | I | A |
Patients at very high ischemic risk (refractory angina, with associated heart failure, arrhythmias or hemodynamic instability) should be considered for emergent coronary angiography (< 2 h) | IIa | C |
An invasive strategy should not be performed in patients: | III | A |
At low overall risk | ||
At a particular high-risk for invasive diagnosis or intervention |
- Citation: Alegría-Barrero E, Moreno R. Percutaneous treatment in acute coronary syndromes. World J Cardiol 2011; 3(10): 315-321
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8462/full/v3/i10/315.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v3.i10.315