Copyright
©2010 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Cardiol. Aug 26, 2010; 2(8): 243-250
Published online Aug 26, 2010. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v2.i8.243
Published online Aug 26, 2010. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v2.i8.243
Ref. | Study design | Subjects | Conclusion |
Murray et al[76] | Prospective study, retrospective analysis | 732 patients; AF rhythm control | No difference in AF recurrence |
Madrid et al[71] | Prospective (electrical cardioversion) | 154 patients; amiodarone only vs amiodarone + irbesartan | Recurrence of AF lower in irbesartan group |
Zaman et al[73] | Prospective (electrical cardioversion) | 47 patients; ACEI vs no ACEI group | Number of defibrillation attempts required for successful cardioversion was less in ACEI group |
Ueng et al[72] | Prospective (electrical cardioversion) | 125 patients; amiodarone only vs amiodarone + enalapril | Enalapril group had decreased rate of recurrence |
Pedersen et al[65] | Prospective (post-MI) | 1577 patients with LV dysfunction post-MI; trandolapril vs control | Trandolapril reduces AF |
SOLVD[66] | Prospective study, but retrospective analysis (heart failure) | 374 patients with depressed LV function; enalapril vs control | AF rate lower in ACEI group |
Val-HeFT[78] | Prospective study, retrospective analysis (heart failure) | 4409 patients with; valsartan vs control | ARB lower incidence of AF |
CHARM[77] | Prospective study, retrospective analysis (heart failure) | 5518 patients; candesartan vs control | ARB lowers incidence of AF in both normal and depressed ejection fraction |
L'Allier et al[79] | Retrospective (hypertension) | 5463 patients receiving ACEI vs 5463 patients receiving CCB | The incidence of AF was lower in ACEI group |
Miceli et al[80] | Retrospective (post-CABG) | 10 023 patients undergoing isolated CABG; ACEI vs non-ACEI | ACEI treatment is associated with an increased risk of post-operative AF |
Madrid et al[81] | Meta-analysis | Seven trials involving a total of 24 849 patients | There was a significant statistical difference in the development AF with ACEI/ARB treatment |
Kalus et al[82] | Meta-analysis | Four trials | There was a significant statistical difference in the development AF with ACEI/ARB treatment |
Anand et al[83] | Meta-analysis | Nine randomized controlled trials | The use of ACEIs and ARBs had an overall effect of 18% risk reduction in new-onset AF across the trials and 43% risk reduction in patients with heart failure |
Jibrini et al[84] | Meta-analysis | 11 randomized trials | Overall, inhibition of the RAAS reduced the RR of AF by 19%. Reduction in AF was greatest in patients after electrical cardioversion and in patients with heart failure |
Healey et al[85] | Meta-analysis | 11 randomized trials | Overall, ACEIs and ARBs reduced the relative risk of AF by 28%. Reduction in AF was similar between ACEI and ARB and was greatest in patients with heart failure. Overall, there was no significant reduction in AF in patients with hypertension |
- Citation: Ozaydin M. Atrial fibrillation and inflammation. World J Cardiol 2010; 2(8): 243-250
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8462/full/v2/i8/243.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v2.i8.243