Review
Copyright ©2010 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Cardiol. Aug 26, 2010; 2(8): 243-250
Published online Aug 26, 2010. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v2.i8.243
Table 4 Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers and atrial fibrillation
Ref.Study designSubjectsConclusion
Murray et al[76]Prospective study, retrospective analysis732 patients; AF rhythm controlNo difference in AF recurrence
Madrid et al[71]Prospective (electrical cardioversion)154 patients; amiodarone only vs amiodarone + irbesartanRecurrence of AF lower in irbesartan group
Zaman et al[73]Prospective (electrical cardioversion)47 patients; ACEI vs no ACEI groupNumber of defibrillation attempts required for successful cardioversion was less in ACEI group
Ueng et al[72]Prospective (electrical cardioversion)125 patients; amiodarone only vs amiodarone + enalaprilEnalapril group had decreased rate of recurrence
Pedersen et al[65]Prospective (post-MI)1577 patients with LV dysfunction post-MI; trandolapril vs controlTrandolapril reduces AF
SOLVD[66]Prospective study, but retrospective analysis (heart failure)374 patients with depressed LV function; enalapril vs controlAF rate lower in ACEI group
Val-HeFT[78]Prospective study, retrospective analysis (heart failure)4409 patients with; valsartan vs controlARB lower incidence of AF
CHARM[77]Prospective study, retrospective analysis (heart failure)5518 patients; candesartan vs controlARB lowers incidence of AF in both normal and depressed ejection fraction
L'Allier et al[79]Retrospective (hypertension)5463 patients receiving ACEI vs 5463 patients receiving CCBThe incidence of AF was lower in ACEI group
Miceli et al[80]Retrospective (post-CABG)10 023 patients undergoing isolated CABG; ACEI vs non-ACEIACEI treatment is associated with an increased risk of post-operative AF
Madrid et al[81]Meta-analysisSeven trials involving a total of 24 849 patientsThere was a significant statistical difference in the development AF with ACEI/ARB treatment
Kalus et al[82]Meta-analysisFour trialsThere was a significant statistical difference in the development AF with ACEI/ARB treatment
Anand et al[83]Meta-analysisNine randomized controlled trialsThe use of ACEIs and ARBs had an overall effect of 18% risk reduction in new-onset AF across the trials and 43% risk reduction in patients with heart failure
Jibrini et al[84]Meta-analysis11 randomized trialsOverall, inhibition of the RAAS reduced the RR of AF by 19%. Reduction in AF was greatest in patients after electrical cardioversion and in patients with heart failure
Healey et al[85]Meta-analysis11 randomized trialsOverall, ACEIs and ARBs reduced the relative risk of AF by 28%. Reduction in AF was similar between ACEI and ARB and was greatest in patients with heart failure. Overall, there was no significant reduction in AF in patients with hypertension