Retrospective Cohort Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Cardiol. Feb 26, 2025; 17(2): 99074
Published online Feb 26, 2025. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v17.i2.99074
Table 2 Angiographic data and treatment profile, n (%)
Characteristics
Patients with STEMI
P value
Culprit artery
LAD34 (61.8)
LCX7 (12.7)
RCA14 (25.5)
First angiogramSecond angiogram
Thrombus grade0.127
Grade 00 (0)30 (55.6)
Grade 10 (0)13 (24.1)
Grade 210 (18.2)9 (16.7)
Grade 318 (32.7)2 (3.7)
Grade 418 (32.7)0 (0)
Grade 59 (16.4)0 (0)
Myocardial blush grade0.179
Grade 00 (0)0 (0)
Grade 121 (38.2)0 (0)
Grade 230 (54.5)20 (37)
Grade 34 (7.3)34 (63)
TIMI flow grade0.699
01 (1.8)0 (0)
13 (5.5)0 (0)
232 (58.2)2 (3.7)
319 (34.5)52 (96.3)
Culprit artery stenosis
< 70%7 (12.73)23 (42.59)
70%-95%30 (54.55)21 (38.89)
95%-99%18 (32.73)10 (18.52)
Culprit artery diameter, mm
mean ± SD2.94 ± 0.293.13 ± 0.31
Median (range)3.00 (2.25-3.50)3.00 (2.25-3.50)
POBA/thrombosuction
Yes4 (7.3)
No51 (92.7)
LMWH
Yes55 (100)
No0 (0)
GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors
Yes21 (38.2)
No34 (61.8)