Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Cardiol. Nov 26, 2024; 16(11): 619-625
Published online Nov 26, 2024. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v16.i11.619
Published online Nov 26, 2024. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v16.i11.619
MSC therapies | Comparison |
Advantages | MSCs can be sourced from various tissues, including bone marrow, adipose tissue, and umbilical cord, providing multiple options for therapy |
MSCs have immunomodulatory properties, which can reduce inflammation and fibrosis, promoting tissue regeneration | |
UC-MSCs are easily accessible, have reduced cellular senescence, and do not raise ethical concerns | |
MSCs exhibit paracrine effects that contribute to cardiac repair and functional improvement, even without direct differentiation into cardiomyocytes | |
Disadvantages | The therapeutic efficacy may be limited by low cell engraftment and survival within myocardial tissue |
Clinical trials, such as those using BM-MSCs, have shown variable outcomes, with some failing to achieve significant improvements in heart failure patients | |
Delivery methods, such as multiple intraventricular injections, can pose challenges and may lead to inconsistent results or myocardial damage | |
Factors like cell dosing, delivery techniques, and heterogeneous myocardial environments can affect the overall success of the therapy |
- Citation: Shah S, Nawaz HS, Qazi MS, Jain H, Lucke-Wold B. Living biodrugs and how tissue source influences mesenchymal stem cell therapeutics for heart failure. World J Cardiol 2024; 16(11): 619-625
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8462/full/v16/i11/619.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v16.i11.619