Copyright
©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Cardiol. May 26, 2021; 13(5): 144-154
Published online May 26, 2021. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v13.i5.144
Published online May 26, 2021. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v13.i5.144
Ref. | Country | Subject No. | Mean age in yr | Male, % | Right arm/left arm, n | CAG/PCI (n) | 5-Fr sheath/6-Fr sheath, n | Operators | Medications to prevent radial artery spasm | Approach to hemostasis | Timing of assessment of radial artery occlusion |
Mokbel et al[26], 2018 | Romania | 200 | 63.4 | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | Nitrate | NS | At discharge |
Koutouzis et al[25], 2019 | Greece | 205 | 63.3 | 75.5 | 152/48 | 200/0 | 0/200 | Specialists | Verapamil | Manual compression | At discharge |
Vefalı et al[16], 2020 | Turkey | 114 | 60.4 | 69.3 | 33/172 | 156/49 | 205/0 | NS | NS | Manual compression | NS |
- Citation: Izumida T, Watanabe J, Yoshida R, Kotani K. Efficacy and safety of distal radial approach for cardiac catheterization: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Cardiol 2021; 13(5): 144-154
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8462/full/v13/i5/144.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v13.i5.144