Retrospective Cohort Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Cardiol. Mar 26, 2019; 11(3): 94-102
Published online Mar 26, 2019. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v11.i3.94
Table 5 Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of selected electrocardiographic criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy
Derivation cohort
Validation cohort
CriteriaCutoffSensitivity (95% CI)Specificity (95% CI)PPVNPVSensitivitySpecificity
Derived Criteria1.5 points67.9 (62.6-72.9)81.4 (80.3-82.4)19.097.562.583.2
""2 points42.3 (37.0-47.7)93.0 (92.3-93.7)28.296.237.593.4
""2.5 points30.0 (25.2-35.3)96.6 (96.1-97.1)37.695.630.096.8
Cornell-37.8 (32.6-43.1)92.3 (91.6-93.0)24.195.836.290.3
Sokolow-Lyon-16.5 (12.5-20.5)95.9 (95.4-96.5)20.794.720.096.3
Cornell Product55.0 (49.6-60.3)88.3 (87.5-89.2)23.396.853.888.1
Sokolow-Lyon Product22.5 (18.0-27.0)95.9 (95.3-96.4)26.095.023.895.6
Gubner-Ungerleider27.0 (22.3-31.8)88.9 (88.0-89.8)13.695.027.587.7
Sum-of-12-Lead57.4 (51.9-62.7)76.1 (74.9-77.3)13.496.557.577.1
Romhilt-Estes5 points35.4 (30.3-40.8)94.4 (93.7-95.0)26.295.835.095.0
""4 points51.1 (45.5-56.5)88.2 (87.3-89.0)21.896.557.590.0
Framingham-adjusted Cornell42.3 (37.0-47.7)90.1 (89.3-90.9)21.796.051.387.6
R-wave amplitude in aVL1.1 mV20.1 (16.0-24.8)92.6 (91.8-93.3)14.994.721.392.1
Peguero-Lo Presti24.9 (20.3-29.6)94.7 (94.1-95.3)23.395.126.393.5