Copyright
©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Cardiol. Mar 26, 2019; 11(3): 103-119
Published online Mar 26, 2019. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v11.i3.103
Published online Mar 26, 2019. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v11.i3.103
Study | Intervention/control group | Inclusion criteria | Risk reduction with ICD |
Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable Defibrillators study[17] | ICD vs antiarrhythmic drugs | Resuscitated from near-fatal VF or post-cardioversion from sustained VT | 28% (P = 0.02) |
Canadian Implantable Defibrillator Study[18] | ICD vs amiodarone | Resuscitated VF or VT or with unmonitored syncope | 20% (P = 0.14) |
Cardiac Arrest Study Hamburg[19] | ICD vs amiodarone vs metoprolol | Survivors of cardiac arrest secondary to documented ventricular arrhythmias | 23% (P = 0.08) |
- Citation: Khan HM, Leslie SJ. Risk factors for sudden cardiac death to determine high risk patients in specific patient populations that may benefit from a wearable defibrillator. World J Cardiol 2019; 11(3): 103-119
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8462/full/v11/i3/103.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v11.i3.103