Copyright
©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Cardiol. Oct 26, 2019; 11(10): 244-255
Published online Oct 26, 2019. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v11.i10.244
Published online Oct 26, 2019. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v11.i10.244
Table 2 Distribution of each category of strength of evidence
Category | Criteria | Cases | Proportion |
Strong | (1) Surgery for coronary heart disease (1%); (2) Terminal chest pain and two of: (A) Sudden death; (B) History of heart disease; (C) Medical diagnosis of heart disease3; (D) Terminal shortness of breath. | 213 | 53% |
Medium | (1) Terminal chest pain alone; (2) Sudden death AND either: (A) History of heart disease OR; (B) Medical diagnosis of heart disease; (3) Only medical diagnosis of heart disease. | 87 | 22% |
Weak | (1) Only history of heart disease; (2) Only symptomatic evidence (without chest pain): (A) Sudden death; (B) Hypertension; (C) Shortness of breath. | 98 | 24.5% |
Nil | No evidence for the cause of death. | 2 | 0.5% |
TOTAL | 400 | 100 |
- Citation: Zhang W, Usman Y, Iriawan RW, Lusiana M, Sha S, Kelly M, Rao C. Evaluating the quality of evidence for diagnosing ischemic heart disease from verbal autopsy in Indonesia. World J Cardiol 2019; 11(10): 244-255
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8462/full/v11/i10/244.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v11.i10.244