Meta-Analysis
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Biol Chem. Nov 27, 2021; 12(6): 114-130
Published online Nov 27, 2021. doi: 10.4331/wjbc.v12.i6.114
Table 2 General characteristics of the included studies (n = 17)
Sl. No
Ref.
Year
Study design
Indication
Sample size
Age (yr)
Source (Autologous/allogenic)
Mean follow-up (mo)
1Joske et al[33]1997Case reportFailed DMARDs146Autologous6
2Durez et al[34]1998Case reportFailed DMARDs122Autologous10
3Burt et al[26]1998Prospective studyFailed DMARDs244Autologous12
4Snowden et al[27]1999Prospective studyFailed DMARDs818-65Autologous18
5Burt et al[25]1999Prospective studyFailed DMARDs446.2Autologous12
6Kim et al[35]2002Case reportFailed DMARDs154Autologous6
7Tyndall et al[29]2001Prospective studyPrimary treatment43NRAutologous11
8van Laar et al[28]2001Prospective studyFailed DMARDs818-60Autologous18
9Verburg et al[30]2001Prospective studyFailed DMARDs1443Autologous12
10Bingham et al[11]2001Prospective studyFailed DMARDs637.33Autologous20
11Pavletic et al[31]2001Prospective studyFailed DMARDs642.5Autologous26.5
12Moore et al[13]2001RCTFailed DMARDs3318-65Autologous12
13Burt et al[36]2004Case reportFailed DMARDs152Allogenic12
14Snowden et al[15]2004Prospective studyFailed DMARDs7342Autologous18
15Verburg et al[32]2005Prospective studyFailed DMARDs835-55 yearsAutologous24
16Teng et al[9]2005Prospective studyFailed DMARDs843Allogenic60
17Silva et al[12]2018Retrospective studyFailed DMARDs (10), failed autologous HSCT (1), secondary haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (5)1612Allogenic29