Meta-Analysis
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Biol Chem. Nov 27, 2021; 12(6): 114-130
Published online Nov 27, 2021. doi: 10.4331/wjbc.v12.i6.114
Table 1 Methodological quality and risk of bias assessment of the included studies (n = 17)
Randomized controlled trial
Ref.Randomization processDeviation from the intended interventionsMissing outcome dataMeasurement of the outcomeSelection of the reported resultOverall Bias
Moore et al[13]Low riskLow riskLow riskLow riskLow riskLow risk
Prospective studies
Ref.A clearly stated aimInclusion of consecutive patientsProspective collection of dataEndpoints appropriate to the aim of the studyUnbiased assessment of the study endpointFollow-up period appropriate to the aim of the studyLoss to follow up less than 5%Prospective calculation of the study size
Tyndall et al[29]11222121
Burt et al[26]22212121
Burt et al[25]22212121
Verburg et al[30]22222221
Snowden et al[27]22212121
van Laar et al[28]22222221
Snowden et al[15]11212121
Bingham et al[11]22222221
Teng et al[9]22222221
Pavletic et al[31]22222221
Verburg et al[32]22222221
Case reports
Ref.Selection scoreAscertainment scoreCausality scoreReporting scoreTotal score
Silva et al[12]12115
Joske et al[33]11114
Kim et al[35]12115
Durez et al[34]11114
Burt et al[36] 12115