Copyright
©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Jan 27, 2017; 9(1): 19-24
Published online Jan 27, 2017. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v9.i1.19
Published online Jan 27, 2017. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v9.i1.19
Table 5 Comparison between age, gender, and intra-operative findings
| Study | Most common age group (yr) | Gender distribution (M:F) | Size of perforation | Site of perforation |
| Present study | 46-70 | 5.6:1 | 1.83 ± 0.59 | Prepyloric 45%, Duodenal 40% |
| Lal et al[6] | 30-50 | 4:1 | 60% 2 to 3 cm; 40% > 3 cm | |
| Jani et al[16] | 21-50 | 7.3:1 | > 2 cm | |
| Menekse et al[17] | 39-62 | 6.1:1 | 13% with > 1 cm | |
| Berleff et al[19] | 40-50 | 3.7:1 | ||
| Chaudhary et al[20] | 18-40 | 4.3:1 | > 1 cm in 7.29% | Duodenal 69.7%, Gastric 30.2% |
- Citation: Agarwal N, Malviya NK, Gupta N, Singh I, Gupta S. Triple tube drainage for “difficult” gastroduodenal perforations: A prospective study. World J Gastrointest Surg 2017; 9(1): 19-24
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v9/i1/19.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v9.i1.19