Open abdomen in gastrointestinal surgery: Which technique is the best for temporary closure during damage control?

Table 2 Comparison of the advantages of each technique

Bogota bag	Allows greater number of reviews of the abdominal cavity than the direct synthesis; better control of septic focuses by easy access; abdominal decompression; and functional restoration of the abdominal wall; has low cost; immediate availability; flexibility and high resistance; is not adhered to the tissues; does not cause allergic or inflammatory reactions; has quick and easy installation; can be used in any part of the body; allows the visualization of organs; is used in trauma, cancer surgery, and various abdominal surgeries; is a protector against water loss and heat
Barker technique	It is an inexpensive technique; uses material found in the surgical center and easily applicable; has moderate fluid control; allows closure of the abdominal wall with less tension; has low rates of complications
Vacuum-assisted closure therapy	It prevents contamination; allows dissection of the wound; protects the wound from external injuries; reduces the interstitial pressure; increases blood flow to the lesion; reduces the expression of matrix metalloproteinases in chronic wounds; promotes wound healing; removes stagnant fluids and debris; increases proliferation and cell division rates; induces granulation tissue formation; and brings greater comfort to the patient with infrequent complications. In selected cases it can be used as an outpatient procedure; allows shorter hospital stay and better quality of life