Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Jun 27, 2016; 8(6): 427-435
Published online Jun 27, 2016. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v8.i6.427
Table 1 Patients’ demographic data, todani bile duct cyst subtypes and imaging studies
Patient with previous CEPatient without previous CETotalP value
Patients16227243-
Median age (yr) at the time of BDC resection47.8 (26-60)29.2 (0-81)30.8 (0-81)0.0074
Sex ratio F/M73.733.80.5359
Adults/children16/0148/79164/790.0041
ASA score1
1 or 215 (93.75%)217 (95.6%)232 (95.0%)0.5350
≥ 31 (6.3%)10 (4.4%)11 (4.5%)
Types of imaging studies
None (incidental detection)1 (6.3%)2 (0.9%)3 (1.2%)0.1855
Percutaneous ultrasound8 (50.0%)188 (82.8%)196 (80.7%)0.0042
Computed tomography7 (43.8%)119 (52.4%)126 (51.9%)0.5022
MR- cholangiography9 (56.3%)138 (60.8%)147 (60.5%)0.7194
ERCP7 (43.8%)40 (17.6%)47 (19.3%)0.0186
Endoscopic ultrasound8 (50.0%)36 (15.9%)44 (18.1%)0.0026
Percutaneous cholangiography017 (7.5%)17 (7.0%)0.6115
Intravenous cholangiography2 (12.5%)13 (5.7%)15 (6.2%)0.2583
Intraoperative cholangiography06 (2.6%)6 (2.5%)1.0000
Todani bile duct cyst types
Type I16221237
Type IVB0661.0000
MBC adequately analyzed12 (75%)196 (86%)208 (85.5%)
Cyst involvement of MBC5/12 (41.6%)47/196 (24.0%)52 (21.4%)0.3173
MBC-133942
MBC-228100.2420
Presence of PBM adequately explored10180190
Presence of anomalous PBM8 (80.0%)141 (78.3%)149 (78.4%)1.0000