Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastrointest Surg. May 27, 2016; 8(5): 382-388
Published online May 27, 2016. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v8.i5.382
Published online May 27, 2016. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v8.i5.382
Table 2 Comparison of postoperative outcomes between conventional group and enhanced recovery after surgery group
| Conventional group (n = 40) | ERAS group (n = 40) | Difference (95%CI) | P value | |
| Accomplishment of the discharge from the hospital within 12 d | 92.5% (37/40) | 95.0% (38/40) | 2.5% (-10.0%-16.0%) | 0.646 |
| Postoperative hospital stay (d) | 10.4 (7-23) | 9.8 (6-20) | -0.58 (-1.63-0.48) | 0.280 |
| Postoperative morbidity (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ 2) | 12.5% (5/40) | 10.0% (4/40) | -2.5% (-19.0%-14.0%) | 0.724 |
- Citation: Fujikuni N, Tanabe K, Tokumoto N, Suzuki T, Hattori M, Misumi T, Ohdan H. Enhanced recovery program is safe and improves postoperative insulin resistance in gastrectomy. World J Gastrointest Surg 2016; 8(5): 382-388
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v8/i5/382.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v8.i5.382