Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. Sep 27, 2015; 7(9): 196-202
Published online Sep 27, 2015. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v7.i9.196
Published online Sep 27, 2015. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v7.i9.196
Table 2 Tumor staging
| n | % | |
| Pelvic MRI (n = 47) | ||
| T3N1 | 21 | 44.6 |
| T3N0 | 12 | 25.5 |
| T3N2 | 4 | 8.5 |
| T4N0 | 3 | 6.4 |
| T4N1 | 3 | 6.4 |
| T2N1 | 2 | 4.3 |
| T4N2 | 2 | 4.3 |
| ERUS (n = 119) | ||
| T3N1 | 53 | 44.6 |
| T3N0 | 50 | 42 |
| T4N1 | 9 | 7.6 |
| T4N0 | 3 | 2.5 |
| T2N1 | 3 | 2.5 |
| T3N2 | 1 | 0.8 |
- Citation: García-Flórez LJ, Gómez-Álvarez G, Frunza AM, Barneo-Serra L, Fresno-Forcelledo MF. Response to chemoradiotherapy and lymph node involvement in locally advanced rectal cancer. World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2015; 7(9): 196-202
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v7/i9/196.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v7.i9.196