Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Nov 27, 2015; 7(11): 293-305
Published online Nov 27, 2015. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v7.i11.293
Table 2 Advantages and disadvantages of commonly used composite meshes
MeshAbdominal wall side/visceral sideAdvantagesDisadvantages
Composite meshes[24]Permanent mesh/anti-adhesion barrierPermanent mesh for inflammation, fibrosis, and abdominal wall ingrowth and strengthNo level I evidence of the superiority of one mesh over another. Some differences have been noted in animal models, although adhesion prevention is similar for most[28]. A multi-center, human study is underway to better determine the characteristics of these composite meshes (NCT01355939)[29]
Visceral side designed to prevent adhesion related complications
Dualmesh[25]Micropore ePTFE/Macropore ePTFEMinimal inflammatory reaction[22]PTFE has higher rates of bacterial adherence and less resistant to colonization[31,32]
Adhesions less tenacious than all other meshes[24,30]Higher risk of explantation in open cases (14.2%), but not laparoscopic cases (4.6%)[32]
Less adhesiolysis time/mesh surface area compared to composix[24]Limited fibrous tissue ingrowth and incorporation[22]
Composix™[25]PP/ePTFEPP thought to promote better ingrowth and inflammationAdhesions predominately found due to mesh eversion at periphery[24]
Possible increased infection risk (8% in one series)[33]
Parietex[30]PET/type I collagen, polyethylene glycol, and glycerolUnited States evaluation showed adhesions in 18% of patients, vs 77% when uncoated PE was usedCollagen film absorbed quickly (20 d)[34]
Proceed[30]PP encapsulated by PDS/oxidized regenerated celluloseLightweight, macro-porous mesh[34]Incomplete peritoneal mesothelialization over graft
Induced dense adhesions in rabbit models[35]
C-QUR[30]PP/omega 3 fatty acid gelLess contracture in rabbit model[30]Poor incorporation strength in rat model[28]
Sepramesh[25]PP/sodium haluronate and carboxy - methylcelluloseLow adhesion coverage and good incorporation[28]Inflammation induces breakdown of the coating, resulting in delayed adhesion formation[28]