Copyright
©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Apr 27, 2013; 5(4): 83-96
Published online Apr 27, 2013. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v5.i4.83
Published online Apr 27, 2013. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v5.i4.83
Reference | n | Sensitivity | Specificity | PPV | NPV |
Soriano et al[14] | 62 | 67% | 94% | 89% | 80% |
Li et al[47] | 54 | 79% | 99% | - | - |
House et al[48] | 115 | 86% SMA, 87% CA | 97% SMA, 99% CA | 83% SMA ,93% CA | 98% SMA, CA |
Squillaci et al[52] | 50 | 97% | 100% | 100% | 95% |
Gress et al[53] | 151 | 15% | 100% | 100% | 60% |
Buchs et al[57] | 153 | 54.5% | 91.2% | 66.7% | 86.1% |
Tellez-Avila et al[59] | 50 | 66.7% | 90% | 60% | 92.3% |
Pietrabissa et al[63] | 50 | 82% | 53% | - | - |
- Citation: Egorov VI, Petrov RV, Solodinina EN, Karmazanovsky GG, Starostina NS, Kuruschkina NA. Computed tomography-based diagnostics might be insufficient in the determination of pancreatic cancer unresectability. World J Gastrointest Surg 2013; 5(4): 83-96
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v5/i4/83.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v5.i4.83