Copyright
©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. Nov 27, 2013; 5(11): 300-305
Published online Nov 27, 2013. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v5.i11.300
Published online Nov 27, 2013. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v5.i11.300
Post operative outcome | Drainage cohort(n = 88) | Non-drainage cohort(n = 121) |
Hospital stay1 | 6.5 (4-8) | 4.0 (3-8) |
Antibiotic use (parenteral)1 | 5.0 (4-9) | 3.5 (3-6) |
Regular analgesic use1 | 5.0 (4-9) | 3.5 (3-6) |
Paralytic ileus1 (passing of flatus) | 2.5 (1-5) | 2.0 (1-4) |
Major wound infection | 14.0 (15.9) | 22.0 (18.18) |
Residual intra-abdominal collection | 7.0 (8) | 13.0 (10.74) |
Subacute intestinal obstruction | 3.0 (3.4) | 5.0 (4.13) |
Faecal fistula | 1.0 (1.1) | - |
Incisional hernia | 2.0 (2.2) | 2.0 (1.6) |
Mortality | 1.0 (0.82) |
-
Citation: Rather SA, Bari SU, Malik AA, Khan A. Drainage
vs no drainage in secondary peritonitis with sepsis following complicated appendicitis in adults in the modern era of antibiotics. World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2013; 5(11): 300-305 - URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v5/i11/300.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v5.i11.300