Copyright
©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. Nov 27, 2013; 5(11): 294-299
Published online Nov 27, 2013. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v5.i11.294
Published online Nov 27, 2013. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v5.i11.294
Table 3 Pathological outcomes for open colectomy and laparoscopic colectomy for colonic carcinoma n (%)
| OC | LC | P value | ||
| Grade ofdifferentiation | Well | 9 (10.35) | 4 (23.5) | 0.166 |
| Moderate | 74 (85.1) | 10 (58.8) | ||
| Poor | 4 (4.6) | 0 (0.0) | ||
| Proximal margin (cm)[median (25Q-75Q)] | 10 (5-16) | 7 (7-10) | 0.353 | |
| Distal margin (cm)[median (25Q-75Q)] | 8 (4-13) | 8 (6-10) | 0.570 | |
| CRM involved | Yes | 9 (10.6) | 0 (0.0) | 0.348 |
| No | 76 (89.4) | 16 (100) | ||
| LN yield [median(25Q-75Q)] | 14 (10-17) | 14 (10-15) | 0.619 |
- Citation: Leake PA, Pitzul K, Roberts PO, Plummer JM. Comparative analysis of open and laparoscopic colectomy for malignancy in a developing country. World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2013; 5(11): 294-299
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v5/i11/294.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v5.i11.294