Copyright
©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. Nov 27, 2013; 5(11): 294-299
Published online Nov 27, 2013. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v5.i11.294
Published online Nov 27, 2013. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v5.i11.294
Table 2 Intra-operative outcomes for open colectomy and laparoscopic colectomy for colonic carcinoma n (%)
| OC | LC | P value | ||
| Procedure | RH | 42 (48.3) | 7 (41.2) | 0.801 |
| Extended RH | 9 (10.3) | 1 (5.9) | ||
| LH | 11 (12.6) | 2 (11.8) | ||
| Extended LH | 1 (1.1) | 0 (0.0) | ||
| Transversecolectomy | 1 (1.1) | 0 (0.0) | ||
| Sigmoidcolectomy | 21 (24.1) | 6 (35.3) | ||
| Totalcolectomy | 2 (2.3) | 1 (5.9) | ||
| Conversion | NA | 1 (5.9) | ||
| Total OR time (min)[median (25Q-75Q)] | 165 (128-195) | 195 (143-259) | 0.075 | |
| Intraop blood loss (mL)[median (25Q-75Q)] | 300 (200-600) | 275 (188-550) | 0.512 |
- Citation: Leake PA, Pitzul K, Roberts PO, Plummer JM. Comparative analysis of open and laparoscopic colectomy for malignancy in a developing country. World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2013; 5(11): 294-299
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v5/i11/294.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v5.i11.294