Copyright
©2012 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Mar 27, 2012; 4(3): 45-54
Published online Mar 27, 2012. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v4.i3.45
Published online Mar 27, 2012. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v4.i3.45
Level of evidence | Type of trial | Criteria for classification | Grade of recommendation |
I | Large randomized trials with clear-cut results (and low error risk) | Sample size calculation provided and fulfilled; study endpoint provided | A |
II | Small randomized trials with uncertain results (and moderate to high error risk) | Matched analysis, sample size calculation not given or not fulfilled; study endpoints not provided; convincing comparative studies | B |
III | Nonrandomized, contemporaneous controls | Noncomparative, prospective | C |
IV | Nonrandomized, historical controls | Retrospective analysis, cohort studies | - |
V | V No control, case series only; experts opinions | Small series, review articles | - |
- Citation: Rausei S, Dionigi G, Rovera F, Boni L, Valerii C, Giavarini L, Frattini F, Dionigi R. A decade in gastric cancer curative surgery: Evidence of progress (1999-2009). World J Gastrointest Surg 2012; 4(3): 45-54
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v4/i3/45.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v4.i3.45