Copyright
©2012 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Dec 27, 2012; 4(12): 284-288
Published online Dec 27, 2012. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v4.i12.284
Published online Dec 27, 2012. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v4.i12.284
PGE1 group(n = 15) | Control group (n = 15) | P value | |
Length of tumor (cm)1 | 11.9 ± 3 | 12.3 ± 3 | 0.83 |
Grade of histological differentiation2 | |||
Good | 3 (20) | 4 (26.7) | 0.78 |
Intermediate | 9 (60) | 8 (53.3) | |
Poor | 2 (13.3) | 3 (20) | |
Undifferentiated | 1 (6.7) | 0 (0) | |
Disease stage2 | |||
IIA | 8 (53.3) | 10 (66.7) | 0.72 |
IIB | 2 (13.3) | 1 (6.7) | |
III | 5 (33.3 ) | 4 (26.7) | |
Number of lymph nodes in resected mass2 | |||
0 | 5 (33.3) | 4 (26.7) | 0.79 |
1-3 | 7 (46.7) | 9 (60) | |
≥ 4 | 3 (20) | 2 (13.3) | |
Pathological T12 | 2 (13.3) | 2 (13.3) | 0.75 |
Pathological T2 | 1 (6.7) | 3 (20) | |
Pathological T3 | 12 (80) | 10 (66.7) | |
Pathological N12 | 5 (33.3) | 6 (40) | 0.99 |
- Citation: Farrokhnia F, Makarem J, Mahmoodzadeh H, Andalib N. Does perioperative prostaglandin E1 affect survival of patients with esophageal cancer? World J Gastrointest Surg 2012; 4(12): 284-288
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v4/i12/284.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v4.i12.284