Copyright
©2012 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Nov 27, 2012; 4(11): 256-261
Published online Nov 27, 2012. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v4.i11.256
Published online Nov 27, 2012. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v4.i11.256
Figure 2 Forest plot of comparison.
A: Overall success rate of 6 studies included; B: Success rate without plug-extruded patients; C: Recurrence rate of 4 studies; D: Incontinence rate (3 studies); E: Incidence of other complications (5 studies). AFP: Anal fistula plug; MAF: Mucosa advancement flap.
- Citation: Leng Q, Jin HY. Anal fistula plug vs mucosa advancement flap in complex fistula-in-ano: A meta-analysis. World J Gastrointest Surg 2012; 4(11): 256-261
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v4/i11/256.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v4.i11.256